NSW Police Opposes Arming Jewish Security Group at Events 2026

The New South Wales police deputy commissioner has voiced strong opposition to arming a Jewish security group, stating it could be perceived as favoritism. This development comes during the royal commission into antisemitism and social cohesion, which is examining security arrangements for the Jewish community.

Background: Calls to Arm the Community Security Group

Following the Bondi terror attack, some witnesses have lobbied for the Community Security Group (CSG) to be armed at Jewish events. The CSG, led by security professionals and supported by trained volunteers, currently provides unarmed security at synagogues, schools, and community gatherings. The NSW premier had previously indicated the government was actively considering expanding gun access for the group.

Police Stance on Special Privileges

Deputy Commissioner David Hudson told the royal commission that allowing certain communities to carry arms would fracture relationships between different groups. He emphasized that police are responsible for protecting all members of the community, and that a "user pays" model should be adopted instead, where event organizers pay for police presence.

Hudson stated: "It’s our opinion that allowing certain areas of society, no matter what those areas are, to have special privileges in relation to their security, would further fracture relationships that are fairly tenuous between different groups." He added that arming the CSG could be viewed as the police or governments showing favoritism.

Comparison: Armed vs. Unarmed Security Models

The debate highlights differing approaches to security at Jewish events. Below is a comparison of the current model and the proposed arming of private security.

Risk Consultant's Counterargument

Risk consultant Gavriel Schneider told the commissioner that the private security sector should be armed at open-air events as a "valuable asset" to protect the community. He argued that trained security personnel could provide a rapid response in critical situations, potentially saving lives.

Key Takeaways from the Hearing

• NSW police strongly oppose arming private security groups, including the CSG.
• The police advocate for a "user pays" model where event organizers fund police presence.
• Arming the CSG could be perceived as favoritism and worsen community tensions.
• Risk consultants argue that armed security is necessary for effective protection at high-risk events.
• The royal commission will continue to examine security arrangements for all communities.

FAQ: Arming Jewish Security Group in NSW