ICE Forced Treatment on Hunger Strikers: What You Need to Know 2026

The Trump administration's forced treatment on hunger strikers in ICE detention has sparked outrage among healthcare and human rights groups. A recently reviewed ICE document confirms that at least one detainee was subjected to force feeding, hydration, or involuntary procedures between October and December of last year.

What the ICE Document Reveals

The ICE Health Service Corps (IHSC) published a document in February detailing the use of forced medical interventions on a hunger-striking detainee. The unnamed patient experienced force feeding, forced urinary catheterization, or involuntary blood draws. This marks the first official confirmation of such practices during Trump's second term.

Furthermore, the document notes that at least seven detainees were on hunger strike in February, with IHSC budgeting $4,504.75 for external medical care and $168,928.01 for fiscal year 2026 based on prior costs.

Why Forced Treatment Is Controversial

Healthcare associations and international human rights groups describe forced treatment of hunger strikers as torture. Immigrant rights attorney Eunice Cho, co-author of a 2021 report on this issue, called the revelation "shocking." The practice violates medical ethics, including the World Medical Association's Declaration of Tokyo, which prohibits force-feeding competent hunger strikers.

Hunger Strikes in ICE Detention: A Growing Crisis

This summer, hundreds of detainees staged hunger strikes across US detention centers, protesting unsanitary conditions, medical neglect, and what they describe as physical and psychological torture. ICE officials have denied that detainees are rejecting food for these reasons, but the strikes continue to draw attention to systemic issues.

Key Data on Forced Treatment and Hunger Strikes

Legal and Ethical Implications

Forced treatment raises serious legal questions under US and international law. The United Nations Convention against Torture prohibits such actions, and the US has ratified it. However, ICE's practices have rarely been challenged in court due to the lack of transparency.

Detainees on hunger strikes often have no access to independent medical advice, making them vulnerable to coercion. The IHSC document's lack of transparency about the number of cases and specific procedures compounds the problem. The background to this story is set out in Congressional Democrats Demand Answers on ICE Hunger Striker Treatment.

What Can Be Done?

• Advocate for independent monitoring of ICE detention facilities.
• Support legislative efforts to ban forced treatment of hunger strikers.
• Raise awareness through media and human rights campaigns.
• Encourage ICE to adopt medical guidelines from the World Medical Association.

FAQ